I started reading historical romances when I was in my mid-20s. There were lots of reasons for coming to them late, chief among them my unexamined stereotypes about what romance novels were. But once I was there, I was really there.
When I was in law school, every time I got stuck on a concept, I would read a historical romance and give my brain a chance to relax. As soon as I got summer jobs, I started buying them by the stacks. And when I was out of law school and working for a Very Horrible Boss who let us out to have dinner for an hour or so around 6 PM and otherwise expected us to be in the office all our waking hours, I would go to Borders (back then, it still existed) and search up something I hadn’t read yet.
I probably read over a hundred romance novels in that one terrible year. I can remember some of the ones I read then—I read Julie Anne Long and Elizabeth Hoyt and Jennie Crusie during that year, for instance. But most of them, I can’t remember.
I do remember this: every book I read gave me a space where I could step away from what I was experiencing and remind myself that up was up and down was down and wrong was not right.
I finished that job with the Very Horrible Boss and was about as close to losing my mind as I’ve ever been. Romance novels were the reason I didn’t. Some of them were amazing and necessary. Others of them…were there. And I needed something to be there.
Historical romance novels are in some ways set in a shared world: one where we all know what the ton is (or at least we pick it up from context after our first half dozen books), where we know about tea and ratafia and sometimes things like the Corn Laws and there’s a Season and balls and… well, if you read historical romance, you know what I mean. That place was very comforting to me: visiting it literally saved me when I was on the verge of falling apart.
And so for the first handful of years that I was writing historical romance, I was revisiting that space that had been so comforting to me. It was only after I’d been doing it for a while that I began to really think about why the shared world I was writing in included tea but not the people who produced the tea.
And so for the last three or four years, I have been trying to widen the aperture of the shared world that historical romance is set in. I want it to be comforting for people to visit a place where we have tea and biscuits and also steamed pork buns in the same way that it was comforting to me to read about a tea party.
It is a lot more work. This will be in my author’s note for the next Wedgeford book, but the level of research I’ve had to put into this has been both horrifying and delightful.
But it is also emotionally overwhelming. If I let myself think too hard about everything that is at stake, about how I am writing something that is a reflection of the story of how my great-grandparents left their homes and if I don’t do it right—
I have a vision for what I want to accomplish, and I can’t let myself think about it without reducing myself to paralysis.
When this happens, I just have to take a deep breath and lower the stakes: If I can write a book that is there for someone the way so many books were there for me, that is enough.