We end this year with a summary of our fifth pillar: Integrated Reporting and Advocacy.
At the beginning of the year, we expected that the SEC would have adopted the final rulings on climate reporting before the end of 2022. Alas, this was not to be. As we enter 2023 without guidance from the SEC, we ask, “What is the responsibility of CFOs regarding ESG disclosure?”
The proposal is unusual in that it covers both the front part of the 10K — the narrative portion that includes the business description management’s discussion and analysis, etc. — and proposes a section on climate that would include a narrative discussion of the company’s greenhouse gas emissions, as well as its strategy for addressing climate-related financial risks. Further, the proposal also addresses what’s called the back part of the document that suggests that there be a note in the financial statements that addresses the impact of climate-related risks and opportunities.
The proposal will likely require all filers to disclose Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions, such as onsite or controlled by the company. Some companies may need to include more information about Scope 3 emissions, which are emissions that aren’t produced directly from the reporting company but from the activities of its value chain. (Note: There is ambiguity about how hard it will be for companies to report their Scope 3, as it is permissible to report on Scope 3 using averages.) The ramifications of the above complexity is that the CFO needs to be thinking both strategically and systematically to fully address new K and Q reporting requirements.
Although the regs are not yet in full swing, the ramifications are clear: Get ready for an unprecedented level of reporting. This means that CFOs and CPAs (controllers and accountancies) need to begin to prepare for this inevitability. Like it or not, reporting will take on a new meaning in 2023/24.