I want to talk about a concept that I brought up recently in a post about becoming undeniable. There are so many self-help books and websites out there that talk about winning at life and playing to win at everything you do, but what they all seem to miss out on is how to go from good to extraordinary, and how winning sometimes just isn’t enough to get you where you want to be.
But I’ll take a step back for a second to explain. What does it mean to be undeniable?
To be undeniable means you have reached such a level of excellence and mastery in your field or craft, or even your life, that no one can question your value or authority. Being undeniable means that you have surpassed your competition to the point that they are no longer even relevant. It also means that you have made yourself indispensable and irreplaceable.
I’ll put it in an MMA context. Take a second and think about fights that you’ve watched in the past and consider how even winning fighters are sometimes criticized. You’ve heard the term “winning ugly” before. That phrase is used in team sports, combat sports, and even in business. While winning ugly produces the intended results, it’s not exactly excellence, is it?
I’ll give you an example of what I mean. We all know how nasty and terrifying Derrick Lewis can be, but let me take you back to UFC 226.
If you don’t recall, Lewis was matched up against Francis Ngannou, and it was expected to be a blockbuster fight.
Until it wasn’t.
Even though Lewis won the decision, every media outlet in the country was quick to point out what a terrible performance it was by both fighters and said that it ranked as one of the worst fights (as in most boring) in UFC history.
It was so bad that during the post-fight press conference, Lewis himself said, “…it was a really bad performance. And I know for sure I don’t deserve a title shot. You know, I believe that it hurt me more than helped me. Even though I got the win, I believe it set me probably about two fights back”.
And this is coming from the guy who won the fight!
Look, I’m a huge fan of Derrick Lewis, but in that moment, he proved my point. Sure, you can compete to win, and even beat your opponent, but when your opponent isn’t doing shit, then winning means you only had to do a little more than that. And no one is impressed by that.
Which brings me back to my point: playing to win is not enough if you want to be undeniable. Playing to win is a reactive method, not a proactive one, and if you’ve read anything I’ve ever said, then you know proactivity is the key to overcoming so many challenges in your life.