And each time lost by large margins, but this one is polling better.
It’s not surprising. The rent is indeed too damn high, and the calls for more rent control have never been louder. But robust rent control already exists, with separate city and state laws all applying in a somewhat confusing but very comprehensive way.
As it stands, those laws just don’t cover your house. I think that makes sense: homeowners should be able to rent their houses for financial or personal reasons and not lose control of their homes. They should certainly be able to decide how much they can rent them for and be met with little challenge should they elect to move back in. And that is what the Costa-Hawkins Acts protects.
It also incentivizes building.
If you missed my newsletter last week, I fundamentally believe that the solution to the housing crisis is more housing. Exempting new construction from rent control (as the Costa-Hawkins Act currently does) incentivizes building, and we need more building.
Also, for me, this is a matter of state control vs. local control.
I think letting each of California’s 483 cities make their own rules is what caused this housing crisis in the first place. We need more, not less, higher-level control on zoning and development.