Sometimes, sure.
But more often than not, it's family money.
Picture a couple, one or both of whom have parents who bought real estate or invested in XYZ business/stock/fund decades ago. Maybe some savings too. Rarely a high-paying job here. It's not what they earn, it's what they own.
And no one is waiting for them to die to get theirs, btw. What we are taught about family wealth is wrong - we often think cash getting passed down from generation to generation, like Grandma's china.
The reality is more complex and allows “now money” for their heirs. Wealth is better understood as a nebulous pool (a trust), drawn from in various ways. Grandkids' private school. Startup capital for Junior's business. Family vacations are 100% hosted by the grandparents.
And, in our business, we see a lot of families helping their kids buy houses, usually in some tax-advantaged way. No judgement here. It's extremely hard to get into a market like LA where a starter home costs minimum $1.5 million (with 20% down and closing costs, you're looking at over $300,000 down and $9,000/mo).
These days, you hear even middle-class Joes speaking about creating “intergenerational wealth.”
And why not? There seems to be a gnawing sense that our kids will all have a real rough time (if their starter home payment wasn't sufficient evidence for this suspicion…), and the more of a leg up we can give them, the better. It's not about leaving a giant pile of money for them; it's about being there to help set a foundation for life, from the first house onward…
And the secret is out. Over a lifetime, the real estate values go up, and most people's only inheritable asset at the end of their lives is their home (as I've said, all the money gets spent).