âAll publicity is good publicityâ only works in specific circumstances, but every brand thinks they can do it.
Â
Over the last few years, I've noticed a trend into what I would call ânegativeâ or âtoxicâ marketing.
Â
There's so much that goes under this umbrella, but the biggest thing I've noticed is campaigns based on shock value.Â
Â
Brands, or celebrities, doing/saying things that are extremely offensive to get people talking.
Â
And, yes, of course this has always been a thing, but it's definitely gotten way worse this decade.
Â
And - not to keep going on about it - the American Eagle campaign is a really good example of that.
Â
Because that campaign had to go through SO many people to get approved.Â
Â
They knew what they were doing.
And they even did an interview saying that Sydney Sweeney was the one who said she wanted to be as controversial as possible.
Â
Why?Â
For clicks. For views. For attention.
Â
The issue with this is that this was a trend that really became a thing with influencers and internet personalities (think, the Kardashians)Â
Â
But that's because the job of people in those industries is to be relevant, at all costs.
Â
That's it. That's the whole job.Â
Â
But for brands, or actors, (or CEOs at Coldplay concerts on cam?đ)
Â
They have different jobs - that require them to have a good reputation to get hired, make sales, or get bookings.Â
Â
Brands are not influencers - because numbers are not what matters - actual sales, clicks, and customer loyalty is.
Â
And you know what?Â
Â
I will be very happy to watch all these toxic marketing campaigns and bad publicity damage these brands in the long run đ