The Truth-Teller's Dilemma: Unmasking Without Burning Bridges
Let's talk about something that keeps coming up in therapy sessions, my DMs, and…yeah my own life too: How do we unmask our autistic directness without accidentally torching every relationship we have?
Here's the pattern I see (and have lived):
You spend decades masking your natural communication style. You learn to soften, hedge, imply, hint. You become fluent in NT indirect communication even though it feels like speaking in riddles. It's exhausting, but hey, people seem to like you (or at least, they like the version of you that you've created). Then you get assessed, you start unmasking. And suddenly, your "unfiltered honesty" is causing problems.
Someone asks your opinion, you give it, clearly, directly, factually. They get hurt.
You point out a pattern you've noticed. They get defensive.
You disagree with something that doesn't make logical sense. You're "being difficult."
And you're left thinking: "Wait, I thought unmasking was supposed to be freeing? Why does everyone seem mad at me now?"
The Thing Nobody Tells You About Autistic Communication:
We're not wrong to be direct. But neurotypical communication runs on subtext we're not always tracking.
When an NT person says "What do you think of my new haircut?" they're often not asking for objective analysis. They're seeking reassurance.
When they say "Want to grab lunch sometime?" they might mean it, or they might be performing social niceness with no intention of following through.
When they present an idea in a meeting, they might want feedback, or they might want validation and are already attached to the idea.
We tend to take questions at face value. We answer what was asked. We're operating in good faith.
But NT communication can sometimes have a hidden question underneath: "Do you like me? Am I okay? Will you validate me?"
So How Do We Navigate This?
1. Recognize that "brutal honesty" can sometimes be masking in disguise.
Real talk: Sometimes our post-assessment "I'm just being authentic!" phase is actually... a trauma response to decades of suppressing ourselves. We swing hard in the opposite direction.
If your truth-telling feels angry, reactive, or like you're trying to prove something, pause. That might not be authentic you. That might be wounded you.
2. Ask yourself: "Is this true, necessary, and kind?"
(I know, I know, that's such a cliché. But hear me out.)
- True: Yeah, we've got this one covered. Autistic people are generally not out here lying.
- Necessary: Does this person actually need this information? Did they ask for it? Will it help them or the situation?
- Kind: This doesn't mean sugarcoating. It means considering impact. Can you deliver truth in a way that doesn't cause unnecessary harm? We can be truthful with tact. This might take practice.
3. Learn to read the actual question.
This is hard and honestly unfair that we have to do this work. But:
- "What do you think?" might mean "Do you support me?"
- "Does this make sense?" might mean "Am I on the right track?"
- "Can I get your opinion?" might mean "Please be gentle, I'm vulnerable right now."
You can still be honest. You just might need to address the hidden question first: "I support you, AND here's what I'm noticing..." or "You're on the right track, AND have you considered..."
4. Use the "curious" approach instead of the "correcting" approach.
Instead of: "That's not accurate. The research actually shows..."
Try: "Interesting! I recently read something different, have you seen the research on X?"
Same information. Different delivery. Less defensiveness.
5. Know when you're pattern-spotting vs. boundary-crossing.
We see patterns. We see systems. We see inconsistencies that others miss. This is a GIFT.
But, and this is big…just because we see something doesn't mean we need to point it out in the moment. (Yeah, I'll be working on this in my own therapy until the end of time.)
Your friend's relationship has red flags you clocked six months ago? You're probably right. Do you need to detail them every time they mention their partner? Probably not (unless they're asking or in danger).
Your coworker's project has a fatal flaw? Yes, speak up, that's necessary. But maybe in a private conversation, not in front of their boss.
Scripts That Actually Work:
For disagreeing without seeming combative:
- "Can I offer a different perspective?"
- "I see it differently, want to hear my take?"
- "I'm going to push back on this a bit, if that's okay?"
For being honest when someone asks your opinion:
- "Do you want reassurance, or do you want my actual thoughts? Because I can give you either, and both are valid."
- "I have some feedback, but I want to make sure you're in a space to hear it first."
For pointing out patterns:
- "I'm noticing a pattern, do you see it too?"
- "This might just be me, but I'm seeing X. Does that resonate?"
The Bottom Line:
You don't have to choose between masking and being an a$$h*le. There's a middle ground.
Unmasking your autistic directness is absolutely part of being authentic. AND you can learn to deliver that directness in ways that preserve relationships.
It's not about going back to exhausting NT-style hinting. It's about adding some cushioning to your truth-telling, not to protect other people's feelings (though that's nice), but to protect YOUR relationships and YOUR peace.
Because here's what I've learned: The goal isn't to be the most radically honest person in the room. The goal is to be authentically YOU while still being connected to people you care about.
And sometimes, that means learning a few extra translation skills. Not because you're wrong, but because relationships matter, and communication is a bridge we build together.
You can be direct AND tactful. You can tell the truth AND preserve connection. You can unmask AND keep your people.
It just takes practice. And a lot of "whoops, let me try that again" moments.
Trust me, I'm still learning this one too.