🟦 Real Agent Scenario
“But the SCR 310 Says I Can Get My Money Back…”
📘 Scenario
A buyer goes under contract on a new construction home. The buyer’s agent uses the SCR 310 and explains Due Diligence, termination rights, and earnest money as they would in a typical resale transaction.
After contract execution, the buyer is presented with multiple builder contracts and addenda. The agent treats these documents as standard builder paperwork and does not walk through them in detail.
Several weeks later, the buyer experiences a job change and wants to terminate. The buyer expects to terminate under Due Diligence and receive their earnest money back.
The builder responds that the deposit is non-refundable per the builder addendum. The buyer is shocked. The agent says, “That’s not how the SCR 310 works.”
The builder says otherwise.
⚖️ Broker Guidance
Builder contracts and builder addenda frequently override portions of the SCR 310, particularly regarding:
Earnest money and deposit refundability
Buyer termination rights
Seller default and remedies
Construction timelines and delays
When buyers sign builder-specific addenda, those documents often control over conflicting SCR 310 language. Many builder contracts clearly state that deposits are non-refundable except under very narrow circumstances.
Agents must never assume SCR 310 protections apply fully in new construction transactions. Builder documents are written to protect the builder first, and buyer rights may be significantly reduced once signed.
Failing to explain this distinction exposes the agent and brokerage to disputes, complaints, and potential E&O claims.